Jackrabbit Activity Calendar

Company

Jackrabbit Technologies

Tools

Figma, Figjam, Miro, Great Question

Role

Owner

Deliverables

End-to-end calendar redesign (desktop + mobile)

Reusable design-system components

Dev-ready handoff specs

Usability testing + research synthesis

TL;DR

00 - TL;DR

Rebuilding Jackrabbit's most-used feature for scale.

Jackrabbit's most-used calendar was overdue for a rebuild: dated tech, no mobile support, no room to scale.

Challenge

Approach

Unify classes, events, and appointments into one modern, responsive calendar built to scale.

My Process

A design-thinking process from audit through rollout, grounded in user testing.

Result

30% faster task completion, +45% mobile engagement, 38% fewer support tickets.

01 - The Problem

A legacy calendar that couldn't keep up.

The legacy calendar within Jackrabbit’s platform had become a significant bottleneck for both users and internal teams.

Structural problems in the legacy calendar.
Each one rooted into a framework we couldn't build on.

Legacy Framework

The legacy calendar was built on a dated framework, making updates and enhancements slow, fragile, and costly from a development perspective.

Lack of Responsiveness

The calendar was not mobile responsive, creating a poor experience for users accessing it on tablets and smartphones, leading to misclicks and incomplete actions.

No Room to Scale

The interface lacked scalability and flexibility, making it difficult to adapt to growing feature requirements and user expectations.

Limited User Satisfaction

Limited user satisfaction and rising feedback around calendar frustration signaled a clear need for a reimagined, modern solution.

Framework

Devices

Scale

Sentiment

02 - The Opportunity

One calendar for classes, events, and appointments.

One calendar instead of three disconnected scheduling types. The opportunity was to unify classes, events, and appointments into a single, responsive experience that worked on any device.

What success needed to look like.

Vision

Before designing, we set clear targets for what a successful calendar redesign needed to achieve.

70% + Users

React positively to the updated interface during usability testing and beta testing.

Goals

40% Increase

Boosted

in mobile usage of the calendar.

Load time improvement of activities within calendar.

03 - Goals

Calendar Design Process

Designing the new calendar followed a structured, iterative process, from early user understanding through to release.

04 - The Process

From audit to final design.

1. Site Audit

I audited every entry point to the legacy calendar, documenting UI inconsistencies, usability pain points, and technical limitations.

With a clearer understanding of user struggles, I mapped revised task flows for the core actions, adding a class, scheduling an event, booking an appointment, to reimagine the calendar as one unified experience with fewer steps.

I turned the task flows into low-fidelity wireframes to test layout, component hierarchy, and interactions before committing to visual design.

The final UI brought clarity and scalability to the calendar, reusable components, a responsive layout, and a clean hierarchy, so users can manage classes, events, and appointments in one place across any device.

2. Task Flow Creation
3. Wireframing
4. Final Design

05 - Execution

black blue and yellow textile

06 - Impact

A faster, clearer, more scalable calendar.

30%

Faster Task Completion

in moderated usability sessions

+45%

Mobile Engagement

from responsive layouts

−38%

Calendar Support Tickets

fewer support requests

Efficiency

Mobile

sUPPORT

Iterative usability testing on prototypes shaped the product throughout, through qualitative feedback and observed task performance.

TESTING

Internally, the modular design-system approach cut design and development time for future enhancements.

07 - Reflection

The calendar didn't just look better. It worked fundamentally differently.

Aligning with the broader design system built a foundation that can evolve as Jackrabbit grows.

Design for Scale

Constraints shaped decisions

Working with development constraints early made for a smoother implementation.

Collaboration was Key

Cross-functional partnership turned a complex feature into one intuitive experience.